[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: bug in dlm_process_recovery_data()

[Sunil Mushran]

Dan Carpenter wrote:
> In this case "pos" is "lock" so the code basically is doing this:
> lock = NULL;
> lock = list_entry(lock->member.next, typeof(*lock), member));
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   

Yes, you are correct. The reason it is working is because the resource
will have only one lock on the list. This is the remastery code. I'll 
fix it.