[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: lock the page in __ocfs2_page_mkwrite() -v2
Wengang Wang
wen.gang.wang at oracle.com
Tue Dec 14 20:07:55 PST 2010
On 10-12-14 09:44, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Hi Wengang,
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:52:14PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> > Lock the page in __ocfs2_page_mkwrite(). Or we may get -EINVAL error
> > from ocfs2_grab_pages_for_write() if the page(page cache) gets truncated
> > while someone is flushing the pagecache. In the original code, we are
> > checking mapping earlier in __ocfs2_page_mkwrite() but we don't lock it.
> > so the mapping can change during flushing pagecache.
>
> Thanks for doing this work. Review is below.
>
>
> > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> > index f1e962c..6b7e1f2 100644
> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> > @@ -1130,14 +1130,18 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_pages_for_write(struct address_space *mapping,
> >
> > if (index == target_index && mmap_page) {
> > /*
> > - * ocfs2_pagemkwrite() is a little different
> > + * ocfs2_page_mkwrite() is a little different
> > * and wants us to directly use the page
> > * passed in.
> > + * So far, only __ocfs2_page_mkwrite() passes in a
> > + * non-NULL page. And we locked the page there, so we
> > + * just assert the page is locked. If another path will
> > + * be passing in a non-NULL page in future, the locking
> > + * should be well considered.
> > */
> > - lock_page(mmap_page);
> > + BUG_ON(!PageLocked(mmap_page));
> >
> > if (mmap_page->mapping != mapping) {
> > - unlock_page(mmap_page);
> > /*
> > * Sanity check - the locking in
> > * ocfs2_pagemkwrite() should ensure
> > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c b/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c
> > index 7e32db9..bb29335 100644
> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/mmap.c
> > @@ -79,9 +79,10 @@ static int __ocfs2_page_mkwrite(struct file *file, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> > * from do_generic_file_read.
> > */
> > last_index = (size - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > + lock_page(page);
>
> This breaks the page lock ordering in ocfs2_grab_pages_for_write() -- note
> that the call to find_or_create_page() in that function returns pages in a
> locked state. So roughly, we want to be taking them in index order.
Yes, this sounds reasonable. Let me see if there could be a better fix.
thanks,
wengang.
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list