[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back to buffered
Tao Ma
tao.ma at oracle.com
Thu Apr 8 19:38:33 PDT 2010
Hi Dongyang,
Li Dongyang wrote:
> This is because ocfs2_file_aio_write calls ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write which
> sets direct_io to 0 if it finds out that direct IO would extend the file. But
> later we call __generic_file_aio_write which end's up calling
> generic_file_direct_write because the file has O_DIRECT flag.So every time we
> do a direct write extending the file, the inode->i_size gets inconsistent with
> the i_size on disk because we call generic_file_direct_write, and if we do a
> truncate after this, we will meet a bug in ocfs2_truncate_file.
yes we have O_DIRECT flag set and in __generic_file_aio_write it will
call generic_file_direct_write first and then trigger to
ocfs2_direct_IO. In this function we will check again and return 0. And
_generic_file_aio_write will fall back to buffered write if the directIO
can't write. Am I wrong somehow?
Regards,
Tao
>
> On Friday 09 April 2010 02:41:26 Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> I cannot read the bugzilla. Now it maybe that that bz
>> cannot be made public. That's ok. But if that's the case,
>> can you explain the problem encountered. I am not qs
>> the fix... rather trying to understand why this has not
>> been reported before.
>>
>> Li Dongyang wrote:
>>> when we fall back to buffered write from direct write, we call
>>> __generic_file_aio_write but that will end up doing direct write
>>> even we are only prepared to do buffered write because the file
>>> has O_DIRECT flag set. This is a fix for
>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591039
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang at novell.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> index de059f4..707f2a2 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> @@ -1973,18 +1973,24 @@ relock:
>>> /* communicate with ocfs2_dio_end_io */
>>> ocfs2_iocb_set_rw_locked(iocb, rw_level);
>>>
>>> - if (direct_io) {
>>> - ret = generic_segment_checks(iov, &nr_segs, &ocount,
>>> - VERIFY_READ);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto out_dio;
>>> + ret = generic_segment_checks(iov, &nr_segs, &ocount,
>>> + VERIFY_READ);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_dio;
>>>
>>> - count = ocount;
>>> - ret = generic_write_checks(file, ppos, &count,
>>> + count = ocount;
>>> + ret = generic_write_checks(file, ppos, &count,
>>> S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode));
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto out_dio;
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_dio;
>>> +
>>> + ret = file_remove_suid(file);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_dio;
>>>
>>> + file_update_time(file);
>>> +
>>> + if (direct_io) {
>>> written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov, &nr_segs, *ppos,
>>> ppos, count, ocount);
>>> if (written < 0) {
>>> @@ -1999,7 +2005,8 @@ relock:
>>> goto out_dio;
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> - written = __generic_file_aio_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs, ppos);
>>> + written = generic_file_buffered_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs,
>>> + *ppos, ppos, count, 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> out_dio:
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list