[Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v2.
James Morris
jmorris at namei.org
Thu May 7 18:39:53 PDT 2009
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Joel Becker wrote:
> @@ -1402,6 +1419,8 @@ struct security_operations {
> struct dentry *new_dentry);
> int (*path_rename) (struct path *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> struct path *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry);
> + int (*path_reflink) (struct dentry *old_dentry, struct path *new_dir,
> + struct dentry *new_dentry);
> #endif
>
The TOMOYO folk don't need a path hook, so it would be unused, and should
not be added unless someone responsible for an in-tree LSM establishes a
case for it.
> +int security_inode_reflink(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
> + struct dentry *new_dentry);
We don't need the new_dentry argument (this is correct in the low-level
hook, and doesn't compile with CONFIG_SECURITY=y).
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list