[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ocfs2: Inode Allocation Strategy Improvement.v2

[Tao Ma]

tristan.ye wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 07:17 -0800, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> How big is this disk? Maybe one kernel tree untar is not be enough to  
>> expose the original issue. Also, use ls -i and/or debugfs to see if  
>> the inodes have some locality.
> 
> Tao, sunil
> 
> I've tested it out with more attempts, it may have something to do with
> the disk size. but the root pause why i did not get a excited speed-up
> performance gain was due to the iscsi-target(iscsi server) cache. the
> operation in your testcase which was meant for cache dropping is aimed
> at client side(a 'echo 2>/proc/sys/vm/drop_cache' only flush the fs's
> cache for iscsi initor(isci client)). 
> 
> Tao,
> 
> You can verify this by pausing the tests at the right point before we
> start '2rd ls -lR', then flush the iscsi-target's cache by 'service
> iscsi-target restart'(there may be a more graceful way to do this),after
> this done, resume the tests, then you'll find the the realtime it
> consumed will be up to 3 mins around:)
cool, so I am very glad that you got the same result as mine. ;)
> 
> Btw, i really saw lots of locality by 'ls -li' for inodes under a same
> dir, take /mnt/ocfs2/linux-2.6.28/include/linux for instance, almost all
> of its inodes are contiguous one by one regarding to its inode number.
yeah, that is the desired behaviour with my 3 patches. :)

Then do you have any updated test statistics?

Regards,
Tao