[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OCFS2: unhash all dentries on a inode.

[Sunil Mushran]

NAK.

I fail to understand your logic. The code you've added is pretty
much what d_prune_aliases() does (the call you have deleted).

wangang wang wrote:
> In ocfs2_process_delete_request(), we should unhash all dentries on the inode.
> --not only the ones with 0 referrence count. so that it's possible for dput()
> to drop the stale inode.
>
> the patch is against 1.2 svn.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com>
> --
>
> Index: fs/ocfs2/vote.c
> ===================================================================
> --- fs/ocfs2/vote.c	(revision 3101)
> +++ fs/ocfs2/vote.c	(working copy)
> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@
>  					int deleting_node)
>  {
>  	int response = OCFS2_RESPONSE_BUSY;
> +	struct list_head *tmp, *head;
>  
>  	mlog(0, "DELETE vote on inode %lu, read lnk_cnt = %u, slot = %d\n",
>  	     inode->i_ino, inode->i_nlink, *orphaned_slot);
> @@ -253,9 +254,19 @@
>  	ocfs2_mark_inode_remotely_deleted(inode, deleting_node);
>  	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
>  
> -	/* Not sure this is necessary anymore. */
> -	d_prune_aliases(inode);
> +	/* unhash all dentries on this inode */
> +	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> +	head = &inode->i_dentry;
> +	tmp = head;
>  
> +	while ((tmp = tmp->next) != head) {
> +		struct dentry *dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_alias);
> +		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +		__d_drop(dentry);
> +		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> +
>  	/* If we get here, then we're voting 'yes', so commit the
>  	 * delete on our side. */
>  	response = OCFS2_RESPONSE_OK;
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>