> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:00:42 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com> wrote:
> +int ocfs2_stack_supports_plocks(void)
> +{
> + return !!(active_stack && active_stack->sp_ops->plock);
> +}
It's pointless doing !! on something which is already 0 or 1.