> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:00:42 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com> wrote: > +int ocfs2_stack_supports_plocks(void) > +{ > + return !!(active_stack && active_stack->sp_ops->plock); > +} It's pointless doing !! on something which is already 0 or 1.