[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 04/15] ocfs2/xattr: Reserve meta/data at the beginning of ocfs2_xattr_set.

[Tao Ma]

Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> 
>> @@ -1548,6 +1528,11 @@ static int ocfs2_remove_value_outside(struct inode*inode,
>>  				      struct ocfs2_xattr_header *header)
>>  {
>>  	int ret = 0, i;
>> +	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>> +	struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt ctxt;
>> +
>> +	memset(&ctxt, 0, sizeof(ctxt));
>> +	ocfs2_init_dealloc_ctxt(&ctxt.dealloc);
> 
> 
> You can lose the memset if you just do:
> 
> 	struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt ctxt = { NULL, };
Sure. Thanks.
> 
>>  
>>  	for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(header->xh_count); i++) {
>>  		struct ocfs2_xattr_entry *entry = &header->xh_entries[i];
> 
> 
>> +static int ocfs2_init_xattr_set_ctxt(struct inode *inode,
>> +				     struct ocfs2_dinode *di,
>> +				     struct ocfs2_xattr_info *xi,
>> +				     struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xis,
>> +				     struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xbs,
>> +				     struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt *ctxt)
>> +{
> 
> This function looks suspiciously like ocfs2_lock_allocators()... That said,
> I think it's probably fine to leave it on it's own for now ;)
yeah, actually I refer to that function. ;) So maybe we can intergrate 
them later.
> 
> 
>> +	int clusters_add, meta_add, ret;
>> +	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>> +
>> +	memset(ctxt, 0, sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt));
>> +
>> +	ocfs2_init_dealloc_ctxt(&ctxt->dealloc);
>> +
>> +	ret = ocfs2_calc_xattr_set_need(inode, di, xi, xis, xbs,
>> +					&clusters_add, &meta_add);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		mlog_errno(ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mlog(0, "Set xattr %s, reserve meta blocks = %d, clusters = %d\n",
>> +	     xi->name, meta_add, clusters_add);
>> +
>> +	if (meta_add) {
>> +		ret = ocfs2_reserve_new_metadata_blocks(osb, meta_add,
>> +							&ctxt->meta_ac);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			mlog_errno(ret);
>> +			goto out;
>> +		}
>> +	}
> 
> 
>> @@ -2146,10 +2377,18 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
>>  				 */
>>  				xi.value = NULL;
>>  				xi.value_len = 0;
>> -				ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set(inode, &xi, &xis);
>> +				ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set(inode, &xi,
>> +							    &xis, &ctxt);
>>  			}
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> +free:
>> +	if (ctxt.data_ac)
>> +		ocfs2_free_alloc_context(ctxt.data_ac);
>> +	if (ctxt.meta_ac)
>> +		ocfs2_free_alloc_context(ctxt.meta_ac);
>> +	ocfs2_schedule_truncate_log_flush(osb, 1);
> 
> Since this is a set function, which only a small part of the time will be
> deleteing clusters, I think it would be better not to unconditionally start
> a truncate log flush. Maybe you can do that only in the case where we have
> clusters to free?
No problem, it is easy for us to detect whether ctxt.dealloc has some 
clusters to free.

Regards,
Tao