[Ocfs2-devel] Re: [patch 0/5] [patch 0/5] Compatibility fixes for
SLES10
Jeff Mahoney
jeffm at suse.com
Fri Feb 1 16:26:09 PST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sunil Mushran wrote:
> While I've not tested it, the patches here look good.
>
> What about the breakup of the earlier patch? Will it
> be applied atop these?
Hahah, oops. Those are coming. I saw the code in my git tree and thought
you'd applied them as a whole. It turns out I was just being
monumentally stupid, since I had committed them locally to the tree to
generate an easy diff. I thought it curious that the commit log had my
local machines in the email address fields. I'll have those for you over
the weekend. I apparently need more sleep. ;)
- -Jeff
> Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> Hi guys -
>>
>> I just merged today's git tree against SLES10. There were a few
>> errors and a few warnings that have been there all along. This
>> patch set creates new checks to fix all of them.
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Mahoney
>> SUSE Labs
>>
>>
>
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHo7ihLPWxlyuTD7IRApriAJ92MWOxXj3aXfxRsLzsl+5FN/sANwCfYeLM
n9Yc+DI5Csum2xY0ftnAhGs=
=rOJW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list