[Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] Fencing harness for OCFS2

[Daniel Phillips]

Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2006-05-25T20:31:33, Daniel Phillips <phillips at google.com> wrote:
> 
>>Goals:
>>    - Lightweight, kernel based fencing harness
>>    - Support pluggable fencing methods
>>    - Pluggable methods take policy out of kernel
>>    - No reinvented wheels, use kernel modules
>>    - Also accomodate user space fencing methods
>>    - Divide work appropriately between kernel and user space
>>    - Obey memory deadlock prevention rules
>>    - Obey safe module unload rules
>>    - Handle multiple clusters per node
> 
> Sorry we're chiming in so late, but with Jeff's user-space membership
> patches, we have user-space driven fencing working with heartbeat 2.

Which patches?  For OCFS2?  If so, then what have you done to avoid
memory deadlock?

Regards,

Daniel