[Ocfs2-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2
Lee Revell
rlrevell at joe-job.com
Thu May 19 10:20:08 CDT 2005
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 06:26 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Zero terminated strings for lock names is bad taste. It generates a bunch of
> > useless strlen executions and you force an ascii namespace for no apparent
> > reason. Add a 9th parameter, namelen, to the lock call maybe?
>
> What's wrong with ascii strings?
>
> We call those 'UTF8' these days.
I think you just answered your own question.
Lee
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list