[Ocfs2-devel] Two questions

[Kurt Hackel]

Yeah HASHBUCKET will be gone completely very soon, and so will
BARF_BARF_BARF.  The latter one was basically a completely redundant
structure that was almost exactly the same as another and had
unnecessary functions to convert back and forth between them.  I'll be
removing BARF_BARF_BARF and the functions as soon as I can.

Thanks!
-kurt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:45:00AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:29:48AM -0700, Villalovos, John L wrote:
> > In ocfs2/src/hash.c:
> > 
> > HASHBUCKET:  This is a linked list which does not use the kernel's
> > linked list code.  Is there a reason for this?
> Legacy. It'll actually be gone soon as the only thing using it is the
> lockres hash, which will soon be merged into the inode hash.
> 
> > BARF_BARF_BARF: Is there a reason for that being there?  If so maybe it
> > should be documented.
> I'll let Kurt explain that one :)
> 
> We sometimes put #warnings and whatnot in the code for things we want to
> revisit in the future...
> 	--Mark
> 
> --
> Mark Fasheh
> Software Developer, Oracle Corp
> mark.fasheh at oracle.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel