[Ocfs-users] Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2

Thu Jul 27 12:31:19 CDT 2006

Figured I would throw this out there, not sure if it applies to your
situation:

Did you guys run fsck.ocfs, per the readme for going up from 1.0.9?
This applies to 1.0.13 as well.

"Running a mix of nodes with 1.0.9 or earlier and 1.0.12
is NOT recommended. So, when upgrading from 1.0.9 or earlier,
please umount all the volumes on all the nodes, before mounting
them with 1.0.12. Please also run fsck.ocfs during the upgrade.
The same restriction does not apply for 1.0.10 or later.
That is, if all the nodes are on 1.0.10 or later, the nodes could
be upgraded to 1.0.12 in a rolling manner."

Bruce
________________________________

From: ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Chris Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:09 PM
To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2

Ivan, 

I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago and
mailed this list.  Never got a response. 
We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from
backup. 

Chris Taylor 
Sr. Oracle DBA 
Unique Solutions 
www.unisolinc.com 
Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242 
Cell: 336-262-5545 

-----Original Message----- 
From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:00 PM 
To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com 
Subject: Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 

Send Ocfs-users mailing list submissions to 
        ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
        http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users 
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
        ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com 

You can reach the person managing the list at 
        ocfs-users-owner at oss.oracle.com 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Ocfs-users digest..." 

Today's Topics: 

   1. Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS (Ivan Wong) 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Message: 1 
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:45:23 -0700 
From: "Ivan Wong" <ivan.wong at e2open.com> 
Subject: [Ocfs-users] Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS 
To: <ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com> 
Message-ID: 

<FB46E2D2BC09EC479EE1FA1D930A79D30318FECA at us1e2k2.corp.e2open.com> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 

Hi experts, 

We did an ocfs upgrade from: 

ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.9-9 
ocfs-support-1.0.9-9 
ocfs-tools-1.0.9-9 

to 

ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1 
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 

with below enviroment now: 

[oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ uname -a Linux x335-a52 2.4.9-e.25smp
#1 SMP Fri Jun 6 18:11:40 EDT 2003 i686 unknown

[oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs 
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1 
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 

After upgrade, we find one of the mountpoint corrupted: 

[root at x335-a55 root]# mount /ora02 
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, 
       or too many mounted file systems 

************************************************************************

******** 
[root at x335-a52 root]# fsck.ocfs /dev/sdb1 fsck.ocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri Mar
5 14:35:41 PST 2004 (build 
b5602eb387c7409e9f814faf1d363b5b) 
Checking Volume Header... 
WARNING: nonzero bytes after the disk header structure          <<<<<<< 
corruption 
ERROR: structure failed verification, fsck.c, 384 ocfs_vol_disk_hdr
================================= 
minor_version: <INVALID VALUE> 0 
major_version: <INVALID VALUE> 2 
signature: OracleCFS 
mount_point: /ora02 
serial_num: 0 
device_size: 26843529216 
start_off: 0 
bitmap_off: 56320 
publ_off: 23552 
vote_off: 39936 
root_bitmap_off: 0 
data_start_off: 1368064 
root_bitmap_size: 0 
root_off: 2416640 
root_size: 0 
cluster_size: 131072 
num_nodes: 32 
num_clusters: 204785 
dir_node_size: 0 
file_node_size: 0 
internal_off: 1368064 
node_cfg_off: 4096 
node_cfg_size: 17408 
new_cfg_off: 21504 
prot_bits: -rwxr-xr-x 
uid: 5550 (oracle) 
gid: 5550 (dba) 
excl_mount: OCFS_INVALID_NODE_NUM 
ERROR: Volume header bad. Exiting, fsck.c, 669              <<<<<<<< 
corruption 
/dev/sdb1: 2 errors, 0 objects, 0/204785 blocks 
************************************************************************

******** 

We still have 8 more production servers to upgrade to and would
definitely like to avoid/solve this problem. Please advice.

Thanks / regards, 

Ivan Wong 

Database Administrator 

e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com <http://www.e2open.com/> ) 

Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank 

156, Jalan Ampang, 

50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 

DID: +603 2776 6374 Tel: +603 2776 6300 Fax: +603 2712 9112 

-------------- next part -------------- 
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... 
URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060726/99beeeb3
/attachment.htm 

------------------------------ 

_______________________________________________ 
Ocfs-users mailing list 
Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com 
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users 

End of Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 
***************************************** 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060727/fc53ebd1/attachment-0001.html