[Ocfs-users] Problems with OCFSTOOL after LUN Maintenance

[Wim Coekaerts]

those things are fixed in 1.0.11, so if you run previous ocfs then
upgrade
that bug is fixed.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:30:57AM -0700, Tony Johnson wrote:
> In installing 10g\RAC we hit an issue that has been indentified as a bug
> with CRS where the cluster locking files cannot be implemented under
> OCFS. Supposedly they work fine when implemented as Raw Devices.
> 
> We needed to reclaim some space from existing LUN's to create the raw
> devices as we had expected to able to put all Oracle related files under
> OCFS (Yes, we belived the hype). This required us to drop and recreate
> the LUNs that are to be used under OCFS.
> 
> As a result OCFSTOOL does not recognize the new LUNs that were created.
> Also, any new LUNs that have been created are not being seen by
> OCFSTOOL. Oracle support on this issue has been expectedly poor. 
> 
> Has anyone else seen and issue like this ? Thanks in advance.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------
> Tony Johnson					Email  :
> tony_johnson at trimble.com
> Database Administrator	   	            Voice  : ( 480 ) 682 - 0849
> Trimble Navigation  				Cell   : ( 480 ) 570 -
> 0215			
> 7408 W. Detroit Street #100			Fax    : ( 480 ) 961 -
> 8801
> Chandler, AZ 85226
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------
> Murphy's Data Constant:Data will be damaged in direct proportion to its
> value
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
> [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Kendall, Kim
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 8:37 AM
> To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs-users] Expanding (growing) Filesystemss
> 
> 
> We want to expand the LUN's on our SAN. I have expanded the LUN's,
> rebooted the hosts, now want the hosts to mount up the larger LUN, but
> they still see the original size. 
> 
> How risky is it to use tuneocfs to grow the filesystem after the
> expanded LUN is presented to the host? I was unable to find anything
> outside the man page for it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs-users mailing list
> Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users