[Ocfs-devel]
Re: [Ocfs-users] Disappointing IMPORT Performance Using 9i RAC with
OCFS on Linux
John Smiley
pro_oracle at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 26 20:26:15 CST 2003
Wim,
Could you expand a bit on the problem with small I/Os
in RHAS 2.1? Is this problem corrected in the e.27
kernel? If not, which kernel do you recommend to
obtain the best I/O performance?
John Smiley
Sr. Database Architect
Sprint Corporation
--- Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts at oracle.com> wrote:
> well, you should compare it with rhas21 isntead of
> rh8
>
> one thing the rhas21 kernel wasn't good at was io
> grouping, it submitted
> really small io's seperately.
>
> which kernel is this e.25 ?
>
> are you doing loads in parallel on 2 nodes or just a
> single node and you
> just have 2 running ?
>
> you should download the aio patch and try with aio
> enabled.
> lemme dig up the oracle patch you can grab
>
> Wim
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:08:58PM -0000, Kevin
> Miller wrote:
> > I am currently involved in setting up a new Oracle
> environment using 9i
> > RAC with OCFS on Linux. Part of the set-up
> involves importing the
> > application schema which comprises 5.5Gb data and
> 3.7Gb indexes. The
> > initial results are disappointing:
> >
> > Linux non-RAC Linux RAC-OCFS
> > 60 143
> >
> > The results are elapsed time in minutes to
> complete the full schema
> > import (using imp). They are average values from
> several runs, the
> > results from each individual run were fairly
> consistent. Neither the
> > server nor the database were restarted between
> runs.
> >
> > The same dump file was used for each import.
> >
> > The top five wait events for Linux RAC-OCFS
> database are:
> >
> > Top 5 Timed Events
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> %
> > Total
> > Event
> Waits Time (s)
> > Ela Time
> > --------------------------------------------
> ------------ -----------
> > --------
> > io done
> 1,457,317 5,550
> > 51.84
> > CPU time
> 1,628
> > 15.20
> > log buffer space
> 17,957 1,271
> > 11.88
> > log file sequential read
> 6,174 666
> > 6.22
> > log file parallel write
> 19,632 591
> > 5.52
> >
> >
> > For the Linux non-RAC database:
> >
> > Top 5 Timed Events
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> %
> > Total
> > Event
> Waits Time (s)
> > Ela Time
> > --------------------------------------------
> ------------ -----------
> > --------
> > log file sequential read
> 6,254 1,280
> > 28.25
> > CPU time
> 1,242
> > 27.40
> > log buffer space
> 8,673 999
> > 22.03
> > db file scattered read
> 51,788 375
> > 8.28
> > free buffer waits
> 744 330
> > 7.28
> >
> >
> > First glance would suggest that the Linux RAC-OCFS
> database is pretty
> > much IO bound, but this system has a much higher
> specification IO
> > subsystem then the Linux non-RAC system (see
> below).
> >
> > The specification of the systems is roughly:
> >
> > Oracle 9.2.0.4.
> >
> > Linux non-RAC
> > RedHat 8.0 on Dual 1.8GHz Xeon (with
> hyperthreading), 1Gb RAM, 2 Ultra
> > 320 SCSI disks (not striped or mirrored)
> >
> > Linux RAC-OCFS
> > 2*(RedHat AS2.1 on IBM x360, Quad 1.5GHz Xeon, 7Gb
> RAM), fibre connected
> > FastT Disk Array
> >
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> > (By the way, because I don't do full schema
> imports very often I'm not
> > excited about import performance in its own right,
> but I am worried that
> > the relatively poor performance is symptomatic of
> a more general issue
> > that will affect the application itself)
> >
> >
> > Kevin Miller
> > Oracle Database Administrator
> > Burns e-Commerce Solutions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ocfs-users mailing list
> > Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs-users mailing list
> Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
More information about the Ocfs-devel
mailing list