[DTrace-devel] [PATCH 3/3] usdt parser: make sure prbmap is cleaned up in case of error
Kris Van Hees
kris.van.hees at oracle.com
Mon Jun 30 23:09:00 UTC 2025
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 06:07:39PM -0400, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh at oracle.com>
> but it'd be great if Nick could take a look, given that he reviewed the file
> earlier.
> Out of curiosity, was there some case where the assertion failed? Could that
> be a test case?
There was an assertion failure but not one that we can have a test for since
it is in dtprobed and the testsuite cannot capture those at this point.
> (Minor nit: I'd go for a sentence break after "allocate iterators.")
>
> On 6/24/25 17:40, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees at oracle.com>
> > ---
> > libcommon/usdt_parser_notes.c | 13 +++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libcommon/usdt_parser_notes.c b/libcommon/usdt_parser_notes.c
> > index d3d744fb..c98c9fb0 100644
> > --- a/libcommon/usdt_parser_notes.c
> > +++ b/libcommon/usdt_parser_notes.c
> > @@ -829,15 +829,16 @@ usdt_parse_notes(int out, dof_helper_t *dhp, usdt_data_t *data)
> > goto out;
> > err:
> > - rc = -1;
> > -
> > -out:
> > /*
> > - * All tracepoint probes in prbmap should have been removed during
> > - * proessing.
> > + * In case of an error, we don't know whether we can allocate iterators
> > + * so we have few options to provide cleanup. Since cleanup is all we
> > + * do now, we plug the probe cleanup function into the ops for prbmap,
> > + * and let the hashtable destroy function take care of all cleanup.
> > */
> > - assert(dt_htab_entries(prbmap) == 0);
> > + prb_htab_ops.del = (htab_del_fn)prb_del_probe;
> > + rc = -1;
> > +out:
> > dt_htab_destroy(prvmap);
> > dt_htab_destroy(prbmap);
More information about the DTrace-devel
mailing list