[DTrace-devel] [PATCH v2 15/19] Ignore clauses: some clauses are impossible regardless of uprp

[Eugene Loh]

On 10/24/24 17:12, Kris Van Hees wrote:

> Alternatively, I'd propose simply not doing this caching of state concerning
> which clauses to ignore, and having clause_ignore() determine it for a given
> statement without using cached information (since these flags really amount to
> caching of information for optinization purposes).  Perhaps that is the better
> option right now?

I guess that's okay, but at this point I'm inclined to do the 
caching/optimization thing.  I'll do it as you suggest.