[DTrace-devel] [PATCH 4/4] test: Do not depend on ext4
Kris Van Hees
kris.van.hees at oracle.com
Wed Nov 27 16:51:47 UTC 2024
Resend to the list for Nick
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:14:54PM -0400, Eugene Loh wrote:
> E.g.,
> $ uname -r
> 5.15.0-205.149.5.1.el9uek.aarch64
> $ sudo grep ext4_dir_operations /proc/kallmodsyms
> ffffc45a59d9ee88 100 D ext4_dir_operations
> $ sudo awk '/ext4/ { print NF }' /proc/kallmodsyms | uniq -c
> 2342 4
> $ sudo grep -w ext4 /proc/kallmodsyms
>
> So, lots of ext4 symbols (including ext4_dir_operations) but none of them
> are [ext4]. Bug in... kallmodsyms?
>
> On 10/25/24 17:16, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> > I am not too sure about this patch... We are not using kallmodsyms anymore
> > for newer kernels, and on older kernels that symbol certainly be listed as
> > [ext4]. So, if ext4_dir_operations *is* in the ext4 module code (compiled in
> > or loadable), then the proper ref to it would be ext4`ext4_dir_operations.
> > So the test should be able to use that - if not, that seems like a bug rather
> > than something to change in the test?
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:43:55AM -0400, eugene.loh at oracle.com wrote:
> > > From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh at oracle.com>
> > >
> > > It is possible that there is no ext4 module, whether built-in or otherwise,
> > > even if its symbols are present. E.g.,
> > > # grep ext4_dir_operations /proc/kallmodsyms
> > > ffffc45a59d9ee88 100 D ext4_dir_operations
> > > # grep -w ext4 /proc/kallmodsyms
> > > #
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, in
> > > ab883bae "tests, io, scalars: use kallsyms instead of kallmodsyms where possible"
> > > we read:
> > > scalars/tst.misc.x needs adjusting to check for the presence of the actual
> > > symbols we are looking up, since the modules might well be built-in, and
> > > thus not show up in /proc/kallsyms.
> > >
> > > With that patch, in test/unittest/scalars/tst.misc.x, we check:
> > > -if ! $(grep -qw ext4 /proc/kallmodsyms); then
> > > +if ! grep -qw ext4_dir_operations /proc/kallsyms; then
> > > exit 1
> > > fi
> > >
> > > So it is possible for us to find
> > > `ext4_dir_operations
> > > but not
> > > ext4`ext4_dir_operations
> > >
> > > Change the .d script to look simply for `ext4_dir_operations.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh at oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > test/unittest/scalars/tst.misc.d | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/test/unittest/scalars/tst.misc.d b/test/unittest/scalars/tst.misc.d
> > > index 60edab45e..6a5f4ae2e 100644
> > > --- a/test/unittest/scalars/tst.misc.d
> > > +++ b/test/unittest/scalars/tst.misc.d
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> > > BEGIN
> > > {
> > > printf("\nr_cpu_ids = 0x%x\n", `nr_cpu_ids);
> > > - printf("ext4`ext4_dir_operations = %p\n", &ext4`ext4_dir_operations);
> > > + printf("ext4`ext4_dir_operations = %p\n", &`ext4_dir_operations);
> > > printf("isofs`isofs_dir_operations = %p\n", &isofs`isofs_dir_operations);
> > > printf("vmlinux`major_names = %p\n", &vmlinux`major_names);
> > > x = 123;
> > > --
> > > 2.43.5
> > >
More information about the DTrace-devel
mailing list