[Btrfs-devel] Re: BTRFS partition usage...
Jan Engelhardt
jengelh at computergmbh.de
Tue Feb 12 15:39:16 PST 2008
On Feb 12 2008 15:26, David Miller wrote:
>
>> (Yes, I had xfs on sparc before, so it's not like you NEED the
>> whitespace at the start of a partition.)
>
>You actully do unless you want to lose significant chunks of your disk
>space.
>
>The Sun disk label only allows you to specify the start of a partition
>in cylinders, so if you want to use a filesystem like XFS you have to
>start the partition on cylinder 1 which can be many blocks into the
>disk. That entire first cylinder is completely wasted.
Ok you do have a point there. The GPT users win of course, since it
uses LBA, not cyls, so the number of lost bytes is generally below
a cyl.
On the other hand, the H and S of CHS could be lowered and S increased,
e.g. divide H by 2, divide S by 2, multiply S by 4. This gives a finer
bytes/cylinder granularity.
>What XFS does by putting the superblock at zero is simply does not
>take these kinds of issues into consideration.
>
Well it was designed for a different system initially with
a different style of booting.
More information about the Btrfs-devel
mailing list