[rds-devel] [PATCH 1/2] net/rds: RDS-TCP: Always create a new rds_sock for an incoming connection.

[David Miller]

From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan at oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 15:29:08 -0400

> On (05/04/15 14:47), David Miller wrote:
>> 
>> I think adding 64K of data to this module just to solve this rare
>> issue is excessive.
> 
> I'd based that number mostly as a heuristic based on rds_conn_hash[].
> Any suggestions for what's reasonable? 8K? Less?
> (BTW, I think that should be 32K, or am I mis-counting?)

No table at all.

There has to be another way to notice this kind of situation, how
for example does NFS or any other sunrpc using service handle this
case?