<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<tt>Hi Tariq,<br>
<br>
DATA=WRITEBACK:<br>
From your words I understand that IF WE CAN ASSUME/TOLERATE A
POSSIBLE FILES CONTENTS "CORRUPTION" IN CASE OF FAILURE, this
option IMPROVES CLEARLY PERFORMANCE...right?<br>
* I ask to you this cause, according mount.ocfs2 man page, this
option "is rumored to be the highest-throughput option"...which is
a very vague/unclear idea of its benefits<br>
<br>
COMMIT=XX (higher than 5s default):<br>
I am a bit confused: after searching on internet, many people
recommends to use a value higher than 5s default (typically 30s or
60s) in case of performance issues, but you suggests that higher
values can increment number of unecessary writes, that sounds the
opposite so...can you clarify if/when commit="higher value than
default" can be useful?<br>
<br>
<br>
THREADS BLOCKED ON MUTEX ON OCFS2 FILESYSTEM:<br>
From your words I understand that perhaps log area size is too
small which can cause too "extra" I/Os in order to
free/empty/clear log during high write loads...<br>
- There is some method to monitor the log usage?<br>
- It's possible to get the actual log size and/or increase it size
(without "loosing" data)? how?<br>
* I've seen the tunefs.ocfs2 -J option and I suppose doesn't
harm the filesystem but I prefer be sure about this. Anyway if I
don't know the actual size of the log, I can't set an "acceptable"
higher value<br>
<br>
LOGS/ERRORS (ocfs2_unlink, ocfs2_rename, task blocked for more
120s):<br>
Apparently the load in the usage of the app continues being high
BUT ALL THESE errors have dissapeared...<br>
* The usage pattern of the app these days is:<br>
- high number of users generating "backups" of partial
contents of OCFS disk (so: high read+write) <--this is specific
to the last weeks<br>
- "normal/low" reading access to contents<br>
<br>
CHANGES MADE AND ERRORS EVOLUTION:<br>
1) First change:<br>
* two nodes disabled (httpd stopped but ocfs2 volume continues
mounted) so ONLY ONE NODE IS SERVICING THE APP<br>
* After that, errors dissapeared...although %util was high<br>
2) Three days after:<br>
* added commit=20 and data=writeback mount options to OCFS2
volume (maintaining only one node servicing app)<br>
* Situation persists: NO errors, although %util high<br>
<br>
So...It's possible that the concurrent use of the OCFS2 (2-3 nodes
servicing app simultaneously) generate to much overload (caused by
OCFS2 operation)?<br>
* Obviously, the OCFS2 operation generates an "extra" load
but...perhaps under some circumstances (like these days usage of
the app) the extra load becomes REALLY HIGH?<br>
<br>
Regards.<br>
<br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-signature">
<hr>
<img src="cid:part1.04040405.04010706@uva.es">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><font face="Franklin Gothic Book"
color="gray" size="1"><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Franklin Gothic
Book";color:gray; font-weight:bold">
Area de Sistemas<br>
Servicio de las Tecnologias de la Informacion y
Comunicaciones (STIC)<br>
Universidad de Valladolid<br>
Edificio Alfonso VIII, C/Real de Burgos s/n. 47011,
Valladolid - ESPAÑA<br>
Telefono: 983 18-6410, Fax: 983 423271<br>
E-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sistemas@uva.es">sistemas@uva.es</a><br>
</span></font></b></p>
<b><font face="Franklin Gothic Book" color="gray" size="1">
<hr>
</font></b></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 16/09/15 a las 4:04, Tariq Saeed
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F8CE18.80703@oracle.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi Area,<br>
data=writeback improves things greatly. In ordered mode , the
default, before writing<br>
a transaction(which only logs meta data changes) data is written.
This is very conservative<br>
to ensure that before journal log buffer is written to disk
journal area, data has hit the disk and<br>
transaction can be safely replayed in case of a crash -- only
complete transactions are replayed,<br>
by complete I mean: begin-trans changebuf1, changebuf2, ... ,
changebufnn end-trans. Replay means buffer<br>
are dispatched from the journal area on disk to their ultimate
home loc on disk. You can see now why<br>
ordered mode generates so much i/o. In write back mode,
transaction can hit the disk but data<br>
will be written whenever the kernel wants, asynchronously and
without knowing any relationship<br>
to its related data. The danger is in case of a crash, we can
replay a transaction but its associated<br>
data is not on disk. For example, if you truncate up a file to a
new bigger size and then<br>
write something to a page beyond the old size, the page could hang
around in core for a long time<br>
after transaction is written to the journal area on disk. If there
is a crash while the data page is still<br>
in core, after replay, the file will have new size but the page
with data will show all zeros instead of<br>
what you wrote. At any rate, this is a digression, just for your
info. <br>
<br>
The commit is the interval at which data is synced to disc. I
think it may also be the interval<br>
after which journal log buffer is written to disk. So decreasing
it reduces number of unecessary <br>
writes.<br>
<br>
Now for the threads blocked for more than 120 sec in
/var/log/messages. There are two types. <br>
First type is blocked on mutex on ocfs2 system file, mostly the
global bit map file shared by<br>
all nodes. All writes to system files are done under transactions
and that may require<br>
flushing to disk the journal buffer, depending upon your journal
file size. The smaller the size,<br>
the fewer transactions it can hold, so more frequently the journal
log on disk needs to be<br>
reclaimed by dispatching the meta data blocks from the journal
space to their home locations,<br>
thus freeing up on-disk journal space. This requires reading meta
data blocks from journal area<br>
on disk, and writing them to their home location. So again, lot of
i/o. I think the threads are <br>
waiting on mutex because journal code must do this reclaiming to
free up space. The other kind<br>
of blocked threads are NOT in ocfs2 code but they<br>
all are blocked on mutex. I don't know why. That would require
getting a vmcore and chasing<br>
the mutex owner and finding out why is it taking long time. I
don't think that is warranted at<br>
this time. <br>
Let me know if you have any further questions. <br>
Thanks<br>
-Tariq <br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/15/2015 01:55 AM, Area de
Sistemas wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F7DCE5.7090601@uva.es" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<tt>Hi Tariq,<br>
<br>
Yesterday one node was under load but not as high as past
week, and iostat showed:<br>
- 10% of samples with %util >90% (some peaks of 100%) and
an average value of 18%<br>
- %iowait peaks of 37% with an average value of 4%<br>
<br>
BUT:<br>
- none of the indicated error messages appeared in
/var/log/messages<br>
- we have mounted the OCFS2 filesystem with TWO extra options:<br>
data=writeback<br>
commit=20<br>
* Question about these extra options:<br>
Perhaps they help to mitigate in some way the problem?<br>
I've read about using them (usually commit=60) but I don't
know if they really helps and/or they are even some other
useful options to use<br>
Before, the volume as mounted using only the options
"_netdev,rw,noatime"<br>
<br>
NOTE:<br>
- we have left only one node active (not the three nodes of
the cluster) to "force" overloads<br>
- although only one node is serving the app, all the three
nodes have the OCFS volume mounted<br>
<br>
<br>
About the EACCESS/ENOENT errors...we don't know if they are
originated by:<br>
- an abnormal behavior of the application<br>
- the OCFS2 problem (a user tries to unlink/rename something
and if system is slow due to OCFS the users retries again and
again this operation, causing first operation to complete
successfully but following fail)<br>
- a possible problem in the concurrency: now with only one
node servicing the application errors doesn't appear but with
the three nodes in service errors appeared (several nodes
trying to do the same operation)<br>
<br>
And about the messages about blocked proccess in
/var/log/messages I'll send directly to you (instead to the
list) the file.<br>
<br>
Regards.<br>
<br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-signature">
<hr> <img src="cid:part2.00010402.00090402@uva.es">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><font face="Franklin Gothic Book"
color="gray" size="1"><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Franklin
Gothic Book";color:gray; font-weight:bold"> Area
de Sistemas<br>
Servicio de las Tecnologias de la Informacion y
Comunicaciones (STIC)<br>
Universidad de Valladolid<br>
Edificio Alfonso VIII, C/Real de Burgos s/n. 47011,
Valladolid - ESPAÑA<br>
Telefono: 983 18-6410, Fax: 983 423271<br>
E-mail: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:sistemas@uva.es">sistemas@uva.es</a><br>
</span></font></b></p>
<b><font face="Franklin Gothic Book" color="gray" size="1">
<hr> </font></b></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 14/09/15 a las 20:29, Tariq
Saeed escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F71218.6060906@oracle.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/14/2015 01:20 AM, Area de
Sistemas wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F68341.5030303@uva.es" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<tt>Hello everyone,<br>
<br>
We have a problem in a 3 member OCFS2 cluster used to
serve an web/php application that access (read and/or
write) files located in the OCFS2 volume.<br>
The problem appears only some times (apparently during
high load periods).<br>
<br>
SYMPTOMS:<br>
- access to OCFS2 content becomes more an more slow until
stalls<br>
* a "ls" command that normally takes <=1s takes
30s, 40s, 1m,...<br>
- load average of the system grows to 150, 200 or even
more<br>
<br>
- high iowait values: 70-90%<br>
<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt> This is hint that disk is under pressure. Run
iostat (see man page)<br>
when this happens, producing report every 3 seconds
or and look at<br>
%util col<br>
%util<br>
Percentage of CPU time during which I/O
requests were issued to the device (bandwidth<br>
utilization for the device). Device
saturation occurs when this value is close to 100%.<br>
<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F68341.5030303@uva.es" type="cite"><tt>
* but CPU usage is low<br>
<br>
- in the syslog appears a lot of messages like:<br>
(httpd,XXXXX,Y):ocfs2_rename:1474 ERROR: status = -13<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt> </tt>EACCES Permission denied. find the filename
and check perms ls -l.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F68341.5030303@uva.es" type="cite"><tt>
or<br>
(httpd,XXXXX,Y):ocfs2_unlink:951 ERROR: status = -2<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt> </tt>ENOENT All we can say is an attempt to
delete a file from a directory that has already been deleted.
<br>
This requires some knowledge of the
environment. Is there an application log. <br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F68341.5030303@uva.es" type="cite"><tt>
<br>
and the more "worrying":<br>
kernel: INFO: task httpd:3488 blocked for more than
120 seconds.<br>
kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
message.<br>
kernel: httpd D c6fe5d74 0 3488 1616
0x00000080 <br>
kernel: c6fe5e04 00000082 00000000 c6fe5d74 c6fe5d74
000041fd c6fe5d88 c0439b18<br>
kernel: c0b976c0 c0b976c0 c0b976c0 c0b976c0 ed0f0ac0
c6fe5de8 c0b976c0 f75ac6c0<br>
kernel: f2f0cd60 c0a95060 00000001 c6fe5dbc c0874b8d
c6fe5de8 f8fd9a86 00000001<br>
kernel: Call Trace:<br>
kernel: [<c0439b18>] ?
default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10<br>
kernel: [<c0874b8d>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xd/0x10<br>
kernel: [<f8fd9a86>] ?
ocfs2_dentry_revalidate+0xc6/0x2d0 [ocfs2]<br>
kernel: [<f8ff17be>] ?
ocfs2_permission+0xfe/0x110 [ocfs2]<br>
kernel: [<f905b6f0>] ?
ocfs2_acl_chmod+0xd0/0xd0 [ocfs2]<br>
kernel: [<c0873105>] schedule+0x35/0x50<br>
kernel: [<c0873b2e>]
__mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbe/0x120<br>
....<br>
<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt>the important part of bt is cut off. Where is the rest of
it? The entries starting with "?"<br>
are junk. You can attach /v/l/messages to give us a complete
pic.My guess is blocking on <br>
mutex for so long is that the thread holding mutex is
blocked on i/o. <br>
Run "ps -e -o pid,stat,comm,whchan=WIDE_WCHAN-COLUMN" and
look at 'D' state (uninterruptable slee)<br>
process. These are processes usually blocked on i/o. <br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:55F68341.5030303@uva.es" type="cite"><tt>
<br>
(UNACCEPTABLE) WORKAROUND:<br>
stop httpd (really slow)<br>
stop ocfs2 service (really slow)<br>
start ocfs2 an httpd<br>
<br>
MORE INFO:<br>
- OS information:<br>
Oracle Linux 6.4 32bit<br>
4GB RAM<br>
uname -a: 2.6.39-400.109.6.el6uek.i686 #1 SMP Wed Aug
28 09:55:10 PDT 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux<br>
* anyway: we have another 5 nodes cluster with Oracle
Linux 7.1 (so 64bit OS) serving a newer version of the
same application and the problems are similar, so it
appears not to be a OS problem but a more specific OCFS2
problem (bug? some tuning? other?)<br>
<br>
- standard configuration<br>
* if you want I can show the cluster.conf
configuration but is the "expected configuration"<br>
<br>
- standard configuration in o2cb:<br>
Driver for "configfs": Loaded<br>
Filesystem "configfs": Mounted<br>
Stack glue driver: Loaded<br>
Stack plugin "o2cb": Loaded<br>
Driver for "ocfs2_dlmfs": Loaded<br>
Filesystem "ocfs2_dlmfs": Mounted<br>
Checking O2CB cluster "MoodleOCFS2": Online<br>
Heartbeat dead threshold: 31<br>
Network idle timeout: 30000<br>
Network keepalive delay: 2000<br>
Network reconnect delay: 2000<br>
Heartbeat mode: Local<br>
Checking O2CB heartbeat: Active<br>
<br>
- mount options: _netdev,rw,noatime<br>
* so other options (commit, data, ...) have their
default values<br>
<br>
<br>
Any ideas/suggestion?<br>
<br>
Regards.<br>
<br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<hr> <img src="cid:part4.00060904.03020200@uva.es">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><font face="Franklin Gothic Book"
color="gray" size="1"><span
style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Franklin
Gothic Book";color:gray; font-weight:bold">
Area de Sistemas<br>
Servicio de las Tecnologias de la Informacion y
Comunicaciones (STIC)<br>
Universidad de Valladolid<br>
Edificio Alfonso VIII, C/Real de Burgos s/n.
47011, Valladolid - ESPAÑA<br>
Telefono: 983 18-6410, Fax: 983 423271<br>
E-mail: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:sistemas@uva.es">sistemas@uva.es</a><br>
</span></font></b></p>
<b><font face="Franklin Gothic Book" color="gray" size="1">
<hr> </font></b></div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com">Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users">https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>