<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 6/17/2010 1:32 AM, Joel Becker wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20100617083216.GA17748@mail.oracle.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 06:44:43PM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">One way to skip a lockres in the purgelist is to list_del_init() and
list_add_tail(). That simplifies the patch a lot.
I have attached a quick & dirty patch. See if that satisfies all the
requirements.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
As far as I can tell from reading the code, the time_after()
check is because they are time ordered. Wouldn't moving it to the end
violate that?
</pre>
</blockquote>
right. that's why I didn't want to move used lockres to tail :)<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20100617083216.GA17748@mail.oracle.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Joel
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>