[Ocfs-users] Mouting Filesystem problems

David Sharples davidsharples at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 13:47:03 CST 2005 

Hi, 

here is what I did now

on one of the nodes

vi /etc/ocfs.conf
 removed the node name parameter value

[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 etc]# more ocfs.conf
#
# ocfs config
# Ensure this file exists in /etc
#

        node_name = lncstrtmit03
        node_number =
        ip_address = 10.85.151.21
        ip_port = 7000
        comm_voting = 1
        guid = DF961E85CB3A49C9F7CD000E7FAF2AC4

[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 etc]# cd /etc/init.d
[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 init.d]# ./ocfs stop
[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 init.d]# ./ocfs start
Loading OCFS:                                              [  OK  ]

[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 init.d]# mkfs.ocfs -F -b 1024 -g root -u root -L
OCSF1 -m /ocfs1 -p 755 /dev/sda
Cleared volume header sectors
Cleared node config sectors
Cleared publish sectors
Cleared vote sectors
Cleared bitmap sectors
Cleared data block
Wrote volume header

[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 init.d]# mount -t ocfs /dev/sda /ocfs1
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda,
       or too many mounted file systems


[root at LNCSTRTMIT03 init.d]# fsck.ocfs /dev/sda
fsck.ocfs 1.1.2-PROD1 Fri Apr  2 13:59:23 PST 2004 (build
2df841d19c031db220f8cfb73439339d)
Checking Volume Header...
Volume has never been mounted on any node. Exiting
/dev/sda: clean, 0 objects, 0/20478 blocks


Also tried it with the parameter completely gone and with a value of
0, same errors


On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:33:53 -0800, Sunil Mushran
<Sunil.Mushran at oracle.com> wrote:
> mkfs.ocfs does not build the root directory. That is upto the module
> to do and it does so at the very first mount. To prevent races, we require
> node 0 to mount the volume first. Once done, the root dir will be created
> and parallel mounts can happen.
> 
> However, you have specified an optional node_number parameter in
> ocfs.conf. And it is set to 2. Hence the problem.
> 
> Either remove the node_number parameter from ocfs.conf. You will
> need to reload the module as that file is only read during load.
> 
> Or, mount the volume from another node which either has
> no node_number set or set to 0.
> 
> David Sharples wrote:
> 
> >Hi, thanks for he reply.  Here are the messages from the time I tried
> >to mount it on the second node
> >
> >Mar 10 17:41:47 LNCSTRTMIT03 kernel: (30369) ERROR: The volume must be
> >mounted by node 0 before it can be used and you are node 1,
> >Linux/ocfsmount.c, 289
> >Mar 10 17:41:47 LNCSTRTMIT03 kernel: (30369) ERROR: Error mounting
> >volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314
> >Mar 10 17:46:58 LNCSTRTMIT03 sshd(pam_unix)[27281]: session closed for user root
> >Mar 10 18:01:07 LNCSTRTMIT03 sshd(pam_unix)[31795]: session opened for
> >user root by (uid=0)
> >Mar 10 18:01:08 LNCSTRTMIT03 sshd(pam_unix)[31795]: session closed for user root
> >Mar 10 18:01:09 LNCSTRTMIT03 sshd(pam_unix)[31804]: session opened for
> >user root by (uid=0)
> >Mar 10 18:01:10 LNCSTRTMIT03 sshd(pam_unix)[31804]: session closed for user root
> >Mar 10 18:05:17 LNCSTRTMIT03 kernel: (32120) ERROR: Invalid volume
> >signature, Common/ocfsgenmisc.c, 820
> >Mar 10 18:05:17 LNCSTRTMIT03 kernel: (32120) ERROR: Device (8,0)
> >failed verification, Linux/ocfsmount.c, 232
> >Mar 10 18:05:17 LNCSTRTMIT03 kernel: (32120) ERROR: Error mounting
> >volume, Linux/ocfsmain.c, 314
> >
> >The node part interests me, do I need a node 0 in a /etc/ocfs.conf
> >(the users guide I have doesnt have that parameter mentioned)
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:32:56 -0800, Sunil Mushran
> ><Sunil.Mushran at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>When you do the mount, the actual errors are dumped in /var/log/messages.
> >>What are those messages?
> >>
> >>David Sharples wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I have blatantly done something wrong here but I dont know what.
> >>>
> >>>Two nodes and my SA presented the same SAN space to both nodes
> >>>
> >>>on node1 the device is /dev/sda and on node2 the device is /dev/sdb
> >>>
> >>>So on node I did this
> >>>
> >>>mkfs.ocfs -F -b 1024 -g dba -u oracle -L OCFS1 -m /ocfs1 -p 755 /dev/sdb
> >>>
> >>>and the output was
> >>>
> >>>Cleared volume header sectors
> >>>Cleared node config sectors
> >>>Cleared publish sectors
> >>>Cleared vote sectors
> >>>Cleared bitmap sectors
> >>>Cleared data block
> >>>Wrote volume header
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>All returned OK with no problems, when I try to mount that file system I get
> >>>
> >>>mount -t ocfs /dev/sdb /ocfs1
> >>>mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb, or too
> >>>many mounted filesystems
> >>>
> >>>So ok, I did fsck.ocfs
> >>>
> >>>fsck.ocfs /dec/sdb
> >>>
> >>>fsck.ocfs 1.1.2-PROD1 Fri Apr  2 13:59:23 PST 2004 (build
> >>>2df841d19c031db220f8cfb73439339d)
> >>>Checking Volume Header...
> >>>Volume has never been mounted on any node. Exiting
> >>>/dev/sdb: clean, 0 objects, 0/20478 blocks
> >>>
> >>>I tried the exact same thing on the other node and got the same
> >>>errors.  These partitions has already been mounted as linux
> >>>filesystems before I did the mkfs.ocfs stuff.
> >>>
> >>>ocfs.conf
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       node_name = mit04
> >>>       node_number = 2
> >>>       ip_address = 10.85.151.11
> >>>       ip_port = 7000
> >>>       comm_voting = 1
> >>>       guid = 6EFDD701A21BAEED6A36000E7FAE352A
> >>>
> >>>ocfs-support-1.1.2-1
> >>>ocfs-tools-1.1.2-1
> >>>ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1
> >>>ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.13-1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>ocfs module is loaded
> >>>
> >>>lsmod | grep ocfs
> >>>ocfs                  306016   0
> >>>
> >>>Any ideas?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Ocfs-users mailing list
> >>>Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> >>>http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>

More information about the Ocfs-users mailing list