[Ocfs-users] Problems with OCFSTOOL after LUN Maintenance

Sunil Mushran Sunil.Mushran at oracle.com
Fri Jun 18 12:55:17 CDT 2004


Pre 1.0.11, ocfs had issues with crs. 1.0.11 was released in march.
Since then, we have not heard of any issues.

ocfstool just scans the devices in /proc/partitions, and then looks for
the appropriate signature to identify ocfs volumes. So, if it is not
listing the devices, check /proc/partitions. Are all the devices there?
You can also use mounted.ocfs to see if the volume is ocfs or not.

strace -o outfile octstool
should give us some clues as to what the issue is.

On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 11:30, Tony Johnson wrote:
> In installing 10g\RAC we hit an issue that has been indentified as a bug
> with CRS where the cluster locking files cannot be implemented under
> OCFS. Supposedly they work fine when implemented as Raw Devices.
> 
> We needed to reclaim some space from existing LUN's to create the raw
> devices as we had expected to able to put all Oracle related files under
> OCFS (Yes, we belived the hype). This required us to drop and recreate
> the LUNs that are to be used under OCFS.
> 
> As a result OCFSTOOL does not recognize the new LUNs that were created.
> Also, any new LUNs that have been created are not being seen by
> OCFSTOOL. Oracle support on this issue has been expectedly poor. 
> 
> Has anyone else seen and issue like this ? Thanks in advance.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------
> Tony Johnson					Email  :
> tony_johnson at trimble.com
> Database Administrator	   	            Voice  : ( 480 ) 682 - 0849
> Trimble Navigation  				Cell   : ( 480 ) 570 -
> 0215			
> 7408 W. Detroit Street #100			Fax    : ( 480 ) 961 -
> 8801
> Chandler, AZ 85226
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------
> Murphy's Data Constant:Data will be damaged in direct proportion to its
> value
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
> [mailto:ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Kendall, Kim
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 8:37 AM
> To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs-users] Expanding (growing) Filesystemss
> 
> 
> We want to expand the LUN's on our SAN. I have expanded the LUN's,
> rebooted the hosts, now want the hosts to mount up the larger LUN, but
> they still see the original size. 
> 
> How risky is it to use tuneocfs to grow the filesystem after the
> expanded LUN is presented to the host? I was unable to find anything
> outside the man page for it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs-users mailing list
> Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users



More information about the Ocfs-users mailing list