[Ocfs-users] OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage

Jeram jeram at JISEDU.OR.ID
Wed Jun 2 09:52:32 CDT 2004


Hi Wim...

Ok Then...I will try .11 first, and awaiting for .12,meanwhile I am waiting
for HP Engineers whether they have any good idea from eva6000 point of
view..

Thanks a lot for your informations.
Rgds/Jeram

-----Original Message-----
From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts at oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 8:41 AM
To: Jeram
Cc: Sunil Mushran; ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage


1.0.11 won't change amount of io. if you already have io problems you
have to use .12, which should be out any day..  


On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:35:49AM +0700, Jeram wrote:
> Hi Sunil...
> 
> Thanks for your response, I will try to use 1.0.11, and observe the
> performance...
> 
> Rgds/Jeram
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:Sunil.Mushran at oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 8:30 AM
> To: Jeram
> Cc: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com; ocfs-devel at oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage
> 
> 
> Heartbeating in ocfs is currently per volume. The nmthread reads 36
> sectors and writes 1 sector every second or so. The io in vmstat you see
> is due to heartbeat.
> 
> As far as the mount is concerned, the mount thread waits for the
> nmthread the stabilize, 10 secs or so.
> 
> We are working on making the heartbeat configurable. 1.0.12 will have
> some stuff regarding that.... hb and timeout values. It will not be
> activated by default. We are still working out the details. That will
> reduce the hb related io.
> 
> If you want to use 51 mounts, make sure your hardware can handle the io.
> For e.g., if you see ocfs msgs like, "Removing nodes" and "Adding nodes"
> without a node performing any mount/umount, you have a problem. In
> anycase, you should use 1.0.11 at the least. In 1.0.10, we doubled the
> timeout from 1.0.9.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> Sunil
> 
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 18:04, Jeram wrote:
> > Dear All...
> > 
> > I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box,
> herewith
> > is my environment details :
> > 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise
> > 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6
> > 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes
> > 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE
> > 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000.
> > My Question is :
> > 1. It takes arround 15 minutes to mount arround 51 ocfs file system, is
> this
> > a normal situation?
> > 2. I monitor the OS using VMSTAT without starting the RAC server, column
> IO
> > (bo and bi) it's giving 3 digits value continuously, then I unmount all
> the
> > OCFS filesystem, again monitor the IO using VMSTAT,  column IO (bo and
bi)
> > it's giving 1 digits value, any idea why this is happen?
> > I have raised this issue to HP engineers who provide the HW, have not
got
> > the answer yet.
> > Thanks in advance
> > Rgds/Jeram  
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ocfs-users mailing list
> > Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs-users mailing list
> Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users


More information about the Ocfs-users mailing list