[DTrace-devel] [PATCH 7/7] Implement proc:::signal-clear

Eugene Loh eugene.loh at oracle.com
Wed May 17 16:16:00 UTC 2023


Need tests.

Otherwise looks good, I guess.

But I don't understand some stuff.  Like does one have to worry about, 
e.g., rt_sigtimedwait_time64() calls?

On 5/9/23 18:34, Kris Van Hees via DTrace-devel wrote:
> Drop the undocumented proc:::fault probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees at oracle.com>
> ---
>   libdtrace/dt_prov_proc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_prov_proc.c b/libdtrace/dt_prov_proc.c
> index 2ed3e3f7..e7fbdca2 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_prov_proc.c
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_prov_proc.c
> @@ -87,18 +87,11 @@ static probe_arg_t probe_args[] = {
>   	{ "exec-failure", 0, { 0, 0, "int", } },
>   	{ "exec-success", },
>   	{ "exit", 0, { 0, 0, "int", } },
> -#if 0
> -	{ "fault", 0, { 0, 0, "int", } },
> -	{ "fault", 1, { 1, 0, "siginfo_t *", } },
> -#endif
>   	{ "lwp-create", 0, { 0, 0, "struct task_struct *", "lwpsinfo_t *" } },
>   	{ "lwp-create", 1, { 0, 0, "struct task_struct *", "psinfo_t *" } },
>   	{ "lwp-exit", },
>   	{ "lwp-start", },
> -#if 0
>   	{ "signal-clear", 0, { 0, 0, "int", } },
> -	{ "signal-clear", 1, { 1, 0, "siginfo_t *", } },
> -#endif
>   	{ "signal-discard", 0, { 0, 0, "struct task_struct *", "lwpsinfo_t *" } },
>   	{ "signal-discard", 1, { 0, 0, "struct task_struct *", "psinfo_t *" } },
>   	{ "signal-discard", 2, { 1, 0, "int", } },
> @@ -219,6 +212,18 @@ static void enable(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, dt_probe_t *prp)
>   		uprp = dt_probe_lookup(dtp, &pd);
>   		assert(uprp != NULL);
>   
> +		dt_probe_add_dependent(dtp, uprp, prp);
> +		dt_probe_enable(dtp, uprp);
> +	} else if (strcmp(prp->desc->prb, "signal-clear") == 0) {
> +		pd.id = DTRACE_IDNONE;
> +		pd.prv = "syscall";
> +		pd.mod = "";
> +		pd.fun = "rt_sigtimedwait";
> +		pd.prb = "return";
> +
> +		uprp = dt_probe_lookup(dtp, &pd);
> +		assert(uprp != NULL);
> +
>   		dt_probe_add_dependent(dtp, uprp, prp);
>   		dt_probe_enable(dtp, uprp);
>   	} else if (strcmp(prp->desc->prb, "signal-discard") == 0) {
> @@ -363,6 +368,10 @@ static int trampoline(dt_pcb_t *pcb, uint_t exitlbl)
>   	} else if (strcmp(prp->desc->prb, "lwp-create") == 0) {
>   		emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, DMST_ARG(1)));
>   		emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, DMST_ARG(0), BPF_REG_0));
> +	} else if (strcmp(prp->desc->prb, "signal-clear") == 0) {
> +		/* Pre-condition: arg0 > 0 */
> +		emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, DMST_ARG(0)));
> +		emit(dlp, BPF_BRANCH_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, 0, exitlbl));
>   	} else if (strcmp(prp->desc->prb, "signal-discard") == 0) {
>   		/* Pre-condition: arg4 == 1 */
>   		emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, DMST_ARG(4)));



More information about the DTrace-devel mailing list