[Btrfs-users] [bugreport] btrfs 0.11

[Jeff Mahoney]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris mason wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> - gpg control packet
>>
>> Gabor MICSKO wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 16:16 -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>>>> Yeah, that'd do it. I include the following patch in openSUSE's
>>>> btrfs package.
>>>>
>>>> - -Jeff
>>>>
>>>> diff -rup a/source/file.c b/source/file.c
>>>> - --- a/file.c	2007-06-12 11:36:58.000000000 -0400
>>>> +++ b/file.c	2007-06-12 14:06:53.000000000 -0400
>>>> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct f
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>  	if (count == 0)
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>> - -	err = remove_suid(file->f_path.dentry);
>>>> +	err = remove_suid(&file->f_path);
>>>>  	if (err)
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>  	file_update_time(file);
>>> Is this patch against btrfs-0.11? Because it fails to apply.
>> Oh. No. You're right. That's against 0.9. Here's the 0.11 patch.
> 
> Thanks Jeff.  Is there a #ifdef that I might be able to wrap around this?

Nothing you'd like. I don't have a solution short of an ugly
compatibility patch that depends on CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL (and whatever the
debian/ubuntu equivalent is) or a dependency on autotools. For now, I'm
fine assigning the responsibility to the distributions. The patch was
trivial to update for openSUSE.

- -Jeff

- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHlFBELPWxlyuTD7IRAgXsAJ9ypzQfjJFpKnRiIOmV+db3mYe9BgCdHBCf
QpodG7NLL4MkoAxMvtwjZBc=
=Enx0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----